This slideshow requires JavaScript.

As more than 200 thousand protestors swept through all major South Korean cities last week calling for the resignation of the country’s president Park Geun-hye for her ties to a cult-worshiping confidante, the Samsung conglomerate began to emerge at the center of that political maelstrom.

 The Cult Controls President Park

The protesters poured into the streets after the revelations ten days ago that President Park had been seeking psychic and political advice from Choi Soon-sil, a female friend of 40 years with shamanic leanings, who lacked security clearance.

Choi, now being held in government detention while being investigated, reportedly inherited her psychic abilities from her father, Choi Tae-min, the cult leader, about whom U.S. ambassador to Seoul Alexander Vershbow said in 2007:  “Rumors are rife that the late pastor [Choi Tae-min] had complete control over [President] Park’s body and soul during her formative years.”  The cult leader died in 1994.

While she secretly advised President Park, 64 years old, on a variety of presidential matters from defense policy to the contents of speeches, Choi, 60 years old, funneled funds from corporations to her foundations in return for influence on government policy.  Samsung gave her non-profit shell corporations a total of KRW 20.4 billion (U$178 million), the largest among the corporate donations Choi has to date collected, according to press reports.

Samsung is Behind Choi

Samsung did not just stop there.  Since Sept. 2015, the conglomerate wired a total of KRW 3.5 billion (U$30 million) to Choi and her daughter Chung Yoo-ra, a 21-year-old equestrian dressage athlete currently training in Germany.  Samsung also committed KRW 18.6 billion to a project laid out by the Korea Equestrian Federation to bring Chung to the Olympics in 2020, according to multiple local reports.

In addition, Samsung every month wired 800,000 euros (U$883,000) to Chung and Choi and gave a $1 million horse to the daughter as a gift.

In that period, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. president, external affairs, Park Sang-jin, flanked by the company’s legal counsel, visited Choi in Germany.  Through her German corporation, Samsung donated  22 million euros (U$24 million) to equestrian facilities in the German province of Essen, the Seoul Broadcasting System reported on Nov. 6, quoting Robert Kuypers, managing director of the province’s equestrian association.

Consultation On Labor?

Choi described Samsung’s donations as pay for her influence on the South Korean government’s R&D support and labor policies, the SBS quoted Kuypers as saying.

Samsung in effect paid Choi when it was in desperate need of government favors.  Before and after that period, Samsung could sell low-margin defense units to the Hanwha Group, which also needed a government favor. Its chairman, Kim Seung-yon was released from jail in 2014, after a waiver of the jail terms.


According to SBS reports, Samsung’s president Park Sang-jin visited Choi in Germany last year, and Samsung paid her German corporation 22 million euros in what she said were consultation fees.  Photo: YouTube capture

In July 2016, the National Pension Service voted for a controversial merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries, paving the way at the cost of its own bottom line for the conglomerate’s hereditary managerial succession.

Most of all, in Oct. 2016, Samsung almost abruptly walked out of negotiations with SHARPS after months of delays and failure to reply.

On Nov. 8 morning, Seoul time, as this posting goes online, the South Korean government is executing a search warrant on Samsung’s corporate headquarters in south Seoul as part of investigations into Choi’s influence-peddling.


“It is deplorable.  Samsung, on one hand, attempted to silence occupational-disease victims with a few of tens of thousands of won [several tens of thousands of dollars],” SHARPS said in a statement on Nov. 3. “On the other hand, it spent tens of millions on Choi and Chung.”

“We are witnessing to how Samsung is trading in the tears and blood of hundreds of workers,” it added. “[Vice Chairman] Lee Jae-yong must be arrested and sent to jail.”

On Nov. 5, Hwang Sang-ki, a SHARPS founder and the father of Hwang Yu-mi, the first known victim of Samsung’s cluster, took to the podium at the anti-Park rally in central Seoul and spoke before 200,000-plus protesters.  “Nine years have passed since [my daughter died].” Hwang said.  “The only change has been the number of the dead.  Seventy-six died out of the 224 [profiled by SHARPS].

“So many victims and their families are now living below the poverty line, battling impoverishment and disease,” he went on saying. “How can we understand how Samsung is bribing Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil with billions?”

“They are unforgivable,” Hwang said.

SHARPS’ Sit-in Continues

Since Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS and its supporters have been staging a sit-in at Samsung D’light, the company’s so-called global exhibition space in south Seoul, calling for the world’s largest technology company to:  1) compensate all victims of occupational disease transparently and sufficiently; and 2) make a sincere and full apology.

Last week, they winterized their canopy.


The winterized canopy at SHARPS’s sit-in site.

*The post was updated on Nov. 7 (EST) to better describe why Samsung donated 22 million euros to equestrian facilities in Germany.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

SHARPS and the Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. occupational-disease victims it advocates for have marked the one-year anniversary of their sit-in at the company’s corporate headquarters in south Seoul, with a demand:  Lee Jae-yong, Samsung’s heir apparent, must begin a new dialogue with the advocacy group and cluster victims, or resign.

“Samsung Has Killed This Many”

On Oct. 7 evening, despite chilling rain and wind, close to 200 labor activists, trade unionists, human-rights advocates, and ordinary citizens rallied at Samsung’s 40-story glass tower.  They reaffirmed the resoluteness in their nine-year-plus campaign to bring justice and fair and transparent compensation to the workers who fell victim to blood disorders or pulmonary diseases while working at the company’s chip and LCD plants.

Earlier that day, attired in white “clean suits”, the work uniformed used by the victims, the rally-goers mounted a flash mob at the headquarters and inside the subway station leading to it.  They yelled, “Samsung has killed this many people or more!”

Squatters at Samsung’s Heart

About a year ago, on Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS activists began to pitch a canopy and squat at the gate of Samsung Delight, the company’s so-called global exhibition space, after the world’s largest technology abruptly ended negotiations and unilaterally compensated some victims who decided, often out of their financial desperation, agreed to its confidential terms in return for token payouts.

Samsung has since been dodging other promises made to cluster victims and their advocates.  In Jan. 2016, an outside ombudsman committee was formed to monitor Samsung’s implementation of safety measures.  Little information has since been available about the committee’s activities.

There is little sign that Samsung has improved workers safety at its plants or suppliers.  In Oct. 2016, an independent inquiry by Solidarity for Workers’ Health, a Seoul-based workers safety watchdog, turned up two more workers of Samsung’s suppliers who suffered impaired vision due to methanol use on the job, bringing a total number of such victims up to seven.

Solidarity At Home

Over the year, as SHARPS endured a bitterly cold winter and the hottest summer on record keeping the country’s biggest industrial disaster in the public eye, solidary began to pour in.

All through the year, a security guard at a neighboring building donated his own breakfast and lunch boxes to the protesters.

An impromptu shrine, erected by SHARPS for the victims, has become ablaze with tens of flower beds and posters written in many different languages by international visitors and foreign passers-by.

Each evening, SHARPS has been hosting “talk relays” in which guest-speakers talk about a wide range of topics from workers safety to global peace. The transcripts are now published by a publishing co-op in a 400-page book titled Now, Samsung Must Answer.

Global Solidarity

The recent rise in global solidarity not only boosts SHARPS’s confidence but also helps widen the scope of its campaign globally.

At the rally, SHARPS announced a global petition drive urging Mr. Lee, set to be voted to the board of director on Oct. 27, to renew talks with the advocacy group or get removed as executive.  Before public release, the petition was endorsed by international groups.

Among them was the International Trade Union Confederation, a network of 168 million workers in 156 countries. On Oct. 7, jointly with IndustrialAll, the ITUC released a report, Samsung –Modern Tech, Medieval Condition lambasting the South Korean conglomerate for its no-union policy and routine worker abuse.

“Beginning with Samsung, we have begun to expose corporate greed and the failure of the world’s biggest corporations to account for abuse in their supply chains,”  ITUC General Secretary Sharan Burrow said, commenting on the report.

“Your work in Korea stands tall both in defense of the working people and against corporate greed,” Ms. Burrow said in a recorded video message for SHARPS’s rally, “particularly that of Samsung and the government who refuses put workers first to protect their rights.”


ITUC General Secretary Sharan Burrow:  “Beginning with Samsung, we have begun to expose corporate greed.”

Separately, the ITUC has launched a solidarity petition with Labourstart, an international solidarity network for labor rights, calling on the South Korean government to release imprisoned unionists and respect fundamental rights.

To sign SHARPS’ petition, please click here

Lee Jae-yong:  Failure To Launch

SHARPS’s international petition, together with growing pressure from rights groups across the world, has come at a critical moment for Mr. Lee’s Samsung.

On Oct. 11, the company said it would pull its latest smartphone, the fire-prone Galaxy 7 Note off the market permanently –only 54 days after its much-hyped release.

Galaxy 7 Note was Mr. Lee’s own ambitious project, the momentum of which he wanted to use to pave the way for his formal inheritance of the Samsung conglomerate from his father Lee Kun-hee, who remains incapacitated since a 2014 heart attack.  It was an important opportunity for the son to boost his scant resume blotted largely with a failed Internet venture. 

Samsung skipped the serial model number 6 and named the latest model Galaxy 7, releasing it at least one month ahead of schedule.  On Aug. 25, about five days into the release, some handsets reportedly caught fire or exploded.  On Sept. 1, Samsung issued a recall of 2.5 million handsets, blaming defective batteries made at Samsung SDI, its own affiliate and the producer of 65% of the pre-recall batteries, which recently slashed 35 percent of the workforce.

However, the recall was doomed to fail.  With SDI no longer available, Samsung had to produce replacement handsets at 35 percent of battery production capacity.  Nevertheless, the company produced 1 million handsets during the first week of the recall.

There was no way for Samsung to manage such a massive recall in such a short period of time without undermining quality or safety.  Soon, replacement handsets began to catch fire, leading to the company pulling the Galaxy 7 Note off the market entirely.

As usual, Samsung could push its workers only so fast and so hard.  And that drive began to backfire.

The Galaxy 7 fiasco revealed Mr. Lee’s incompetence as business leader and Samsung’s ruthlessness as employer.

Start Anew: Dialogue or Else

However, for Mr. Lee, his election to the board is an opportunity to start anew.  He should not waste the opportunity to break from the past by showing a new commitment as a stakeholder steward and a corporate citizen.


It’s time for Lee Jae-yong to start a new dialogue with SHARPS.

This why SHARPS and its supporters are petitioning him to reinitiate dialogue. There is nothing new about their demand.. The victims and their advocates are calling on Samsung to renew the commitment to dialogue, on which it reneged by unilaterally walking out of negotiations in 2015.

This is the minimum commitment for Mr. Lee to make.  If he does not comply with the petition, SHARPS and its supporters worldwide will step up with a call for his removal as executive of the Samsung conglomerate.

For Samsung stakeholders at home and abroad, there will be little reason to keep the management of the world’s largest technology company in the hands of a scion of the founding family when he fails to prove his managerial competence or to show a commitment to good business ethics.

Please click here and sign SHARPS’ petition urging Samsung to reinitiate dialogue.



UN Special Rapporteur Baskut Tuncak says some South Korea media have “grossly misrepresented his report on Samsung.  Source: Twitter


In an unusual break from a usual diplomatic tone, a UN hazardous chemicals expert has criticized South Korean media for glossing over his report on Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd and its occupational-disease cluster.

A series of South Korea’s media reports downplayed UN Special Rapporteur Baskut Tuncak’s report on the country when they said he did not turn up any evidence tying Samsung’s working conditions to the diseases and disabilities of its workers, said the human rights and hazardous substances and wastes expert, in an op-ed on Sept. 19 for the independent daily Hankyoreh.

Gross Misrepresentation

“Certain recent media articles [in South Korea] grossly misrepresent my report as not finding evidence that working conditions at Samsung Electronics led to diseases or disabilities among former workers,” said Mr. Tuncak.  “Based on my conversations with companies, the government, scientists, attorneys, mediators and victims, this is far from the truth.”

The opening salvo of the fusillade of false reports was fired on the Sunday evening of Sept. 11 by Yonhap News, the country’s publicly chartered news agency which has little reason to kowtow to Samsung, its largest corporate ad buyer, but often does nevertheless.

The Yonhap dispatch was quickly rehashed and distributed by more than thirty news outlets.

While there is no evidence of direct corporate involvement, the dissemination of the falsified report fit the usual pattern by Samsung of spinning the news: the conglomerate often puts out negative or even false news over weekends to have news outlets release it without fact-checking.


On the Sunday evening of Sept. 11, a series of news reports emerged, falsely claiming that the UN probe did not turn up any evidence tying Samsung’s working conditions to its occupational disease cluster.  Source: Huffpost Korea


On Sept. 16, Mr. Tuncak, a lawyer and a chemist, made a presentation based on his report at the 33rd regular session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.  The 24-page report, dated Aug. 3, delineated a wide range of topics from the Samsung cluster to the Oxy Reckitt Benckiser disinfectant scandal.  The following are highlights on Samsung:

  • On Samsung’s refusal to disclose chemicals used during employment of the cluster victims. “The Special Rapporteur reiterates that, under international laws, global policy frameworks and national law, health and safety information on hazardous substances should not be confidential.”
  • On the government’s inaction. “Apart from these investigations and the industrial accident compensation insurance scheme, the Special Rapporteur notes a surprisingly low level of action taken by the Government, the primary duty bearer when it comes to respecting, protecting and fulfilling the rights of workers and of victims to an effective remedy.”
  • On the Ombudsman Committee to monitor Samsung’s safety efforts. “The Special Rapporteur welcomes the establishment of the Ombudsman Committee, and looks forward to its implementation with both transparency and meaningful public participation by all stakeholders.”
  • On the transparency of compensation. “The Special Rapporteur understands there are concerns regarding how the compensation process adhered to the recommendations of the Mediation Committee and encourages all parties to increase transparency and participation in this regard.”
  • On the burden of proving the work-relatedness of illnesses. “The causal relationship need not be proven medically or scientifically but can be inferred from the consideration of various situational factors. Consideration of all the circumstances, such as the health of the worker at the time of employment, possible explanations for the disease, whether any hazardous substances existed in the workplace and the amount of time the worker spent in the workplace, makes possible the conclusion that there is a proximate causal relationship between the worker’s duties and the disease.”

SHARPS Goes To Geneva

Kwon Young-eun, SHARPS’s full-time organizer, partook in the UN Human Rights Council.  On Sept. 14, joined by other activists from NGOS in South Korea, she mounted a street performance on the cluster victims.  On Sept. 16, SHARPS co-hosted a side session on chemical hazards caused by multinationals in Asia, where Mr. Tuncak also spoke.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

SHARPS’s Sit-in To Mark One-Year Milestone

Since Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS and its supporters have been staging a sit-in at Samsung D’light, the company’s so-called global exhibition space in south Seoul, calling for the world’s largest technology company to:  1) compensate all victims of occupational disease transparently and sufficiently; and 2) make a sincere and full apology.


At SHARPS’ sit-in site, each pair of white rubber sleepers represents a cluster victim.  Credit: Lee Ki-hwa

Korea Workers Compensation and Welfare Service (KCOMWEL) has posthumously granted workers compensation benefits to two Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.workers, after deeming their lung cancers to be occupationally caused—the service’s first-ever admission of a pulmonary condition as an occupational disease for semiconductor workers.


On Aug. 29th and 30th KCOMWEL approved workers comp benefits for Lee Gyeong-hui and Song Yu-gyeong, based on epidemiological findings by its lung disease investigation unit.

KCOMWEL’s approval is a counterbalance to the latest ruling by the country’s highest court, which turned down three Samsung employees’ workers comp petitions by passing the burden of proof  on to the infirm or deceased workers for their occupational disease claims.

The Victims

Employed at Samsung’s chip lab in April 1994, Lee resigned from the job in Nov. 2011, after his diagnosis with lung cancer.  He died, at age 41, in May 2012.  Five month later, his family petitioned for workers comp.

Between Jan. 1984 and March 2001, Song worked at two different units, chip and LCD, of Samsung.  He died in 2011, at age 44, three years after his diagnosis with the cancer.  In 2014, his family filed for workers compensation.

As maintenance engineers, both Lee and Song engaged in etching processes involving arsenic, a well-documented carcinogen.   Additionally, routinely long working hours and daily exposure to other chemicals also cumulatively caused the workers’ cancer, the epidemiological findings indicated.

Parsimonious on Pulmonary Conditions

Despite ample evidence that Samsung’s chip and LCD production processes are limned with chemical exposures, KCOMWEL had cited a lack of evidence and rejected workers comp petitions for workers suffering pulmonary conditions.

This has been true particularly of Samsung’s LCD workers while Song, a LCD line engineer, could receive workers compensation benefits because he spent more than half of his employment at a chip lab.  In December 2015, Lee Jie-hye, aged 29, died of lung cancer after working in a Samsung LCD lab in 2003-2011.  Her workers compensation petition was denied for lack of what KCOMWEL said was “substantial evidence.”

As if in tune with the government’s policy, Samsung’s own limited and divisive compensation scheme does not cover even a single pulmonary condition.   Samsung has no plans to make the change even after KCOMWEL’s decision, according to independent news site Ohmynews.com.

Fourteen Grants and Eight Diseases

As of the latest approval, KCOMEL has granted workers compensation to 14–13 from Samsung and one from SK HYNIX–out of a total of 75 occupational-disease victims assisted by SHARPS.  The service has in effect declared the following eight diseases occupationally caused in the semiconductor industry:



Aplastic anemia

Breast Cancer

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Brain tumor

Ovarian cancer

Lung cancer

 International Solidarity

Currently, two global petitions drives are under way online, urging Samsung to end worker abuse and compensate victims of its occupational disease cluster.  All visitors of this blog are encouraged to endorse them:

Samsung: End Worker Abuse and Abolish Your “No-Union” Policy Now by the International Trade Union Congress

Samsung: Pay Compensation For The Workers Who Died in Your Factories by SumOfUs

SHARPS’s Sit-in: 300 Days And Still Counting

Since Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS and its supporters have been staging a sit-in at Samsung D’light, the company’s so-called global exhibition space in south Seoul, calling for the world’s largest technology company to:  1) compensate all victims of occupational disease transparently and sufficiently; and 2) make a sincere and full apology.






The Aug. 30 ruling by South Korea’s Supreme Court against Samsung’s occupational-disease victims is the latest to a series of biased court decisions against labor rights  Source: South Korean Supreme Court English website

South Korea’s highest court has invoked a controversial clause on the work relatedness of disease and upheld a lower- court decision to reject workers compensation claims filed by three workers who had developed or died of a blood disorder after years of chemical exposure at Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s chip labs.


On Aug. 30, Supreme Court Justice Kim Shin cited a lack of evidence and allowed Korea Workers’ Compensation & Welfare (KCOMWEL) to reject worker compensation claims filed by three victims of Samsung’s occupational disease cluster—yet another ruling based on a problematic law that requires the victims of occupational disease to prove the work-relatedness of their disease.

“While the plaintiffs [the victims] were very likely exposed to carcinogenic materials,” the ruling read, “there is insufficient evidence that would show such exposure caused their illnesses.”

The highest court did not rectify or even mention the error made by a lower court: the appeals court underestimated the risk of trichloroethylene, a carcinogen designated as the highest Group 1 by the WHO in 2012.  The lower court cited the chemical’s old Group 2 rating to dismiss its causal link with the blood cancer inflicted on two of the three plaintiffs.

The ruling is nothing short of appalling because it came only about twenty days after a high-profile Associated Press expose that Samsung and the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) have in effect been suppressing even basic information about chemicals used in chip production from workers who fell victim to a variety of blood disorder after working at Samsung chip labs.

Indeed, Samsung and the KCOMWEL, part of the KOSHA, have been procrastinating or frustrating workers compensation proceedings by shifting the burden of work-relatedness proof onto the victims who have meager financial resources to take on a big corporation or the government.

Between 2005 and 2015, SHARPS helped a total of 75 semiconductor and LCD workers (59 Samsung and 16 non-Samsung employees) petition for workers compensation.  As of today, only nine were granted compensation.

The Supreme Court ruling has now exhausted legal recourse for the three petitioners for the government’s support for their occupational-disease plight, while clouding the prospects for the remaining 63 petitioners who have their cases pending at the KCOMWEL or in court because of delays related to work-relatedness proof.


The Supreme Court decision was controversial enough to necessitate the Minjoo Party of Korea, the country’s largest opposition party—which usually remains tongue-tied on labor issues—to speak out.  “It is hardly convincing that that the Supreme Court places the burden of proof upon workers,” a Minjoo Party spokesman saidThis was the first time since Oct. 2013 that the Minjoo Party, or its predecessors, has ever commented about Samsung’s occupational disease victims.

The Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU), the country’s umbrella of independent labor unions, also issued a statement, saying, “The government and Samsung must determine the cause of occupational disease and come up with responsible measures.”

The Supreme Court decision was the latest of a series of biased court rulings against labor rights and basic freedoms in South Korea.  In July 2016, a Seoul court sentenced a KCTU leader to five years in jail for organizing protests and declared, “Only peaceful assemblies can be protected under the concept of freedom of assembly stipulated in the constitution.”

As for Supreme Court Justice Kim, in 2011, before appointed to the Supreme Court bench, as a local judge, he ordered a female welder to pay her shipyard KRW 1 million(U$1,000) in damages for each day of her 309-day sit-in atop a high-rise crane.  The damages came to KRW 280 million (U$ 280,000).  “He [Justice Kim] just wanted to evict me as soon as possible, and I felt so insulted,” Kim Jin-sook, the 51-year-old welder, said in a National Assembly hearing on Justice Kim’s Supreme Court appointment.

On The Three Victims 

Of the three victims who now have no legislative means for public compensation for their plight, two are male:

Hwang Min-woong, born in 1974, died of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in July 2007.  He worked as an equipment engineer at Samsung’s Giheung plant, where wafers were cleansed and cut, between 1997 and 2005 until he died;

Song Chang-ho, born in 1970, was diagnosed in Sept. 2009 with malignant B cell lymphoma.  He was a plating-process maintenance engineer at the Onyang plant, where chips are packaged and tested, between May 1993 and Dec. 1998; and

Kim Eun-gyung, female, born in 1969, was diagnosed in Jan. 1 with acute myelogenous leukemia.  She was a chip trimmer at the Onyang plant between Jan. 1 and Jan. 1996.   

SHARPS’s Sit-in: 300 Days And Still Counting

Since Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS and its supporters have been staging a sit-in at Samsung D’light, the company’s so-called global exhibition space in south Seoul, calling for the world’s largest technology company to:  1) compensate all victims of occupational disease transparently and sufficiently; and 2) make a sincere and full apology.




On Aug. 16, Toronto Star, Canada’s largest daily, ran an AP expose on Samsung on the front page


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and the South Korean government have been appearing increasingly perturbed as AP investigative reports  on their collusive efforts to block the release of information critical to workers compensation petitions filed by the tech company’s occupational-disease victims spread worldwide.

AP Reports Ripple Out

On Aug 10, the AP reported that the South Korean government allowed Samsung to cite trade secret concerns to withhold information about on-the-job chemical exposure from at least six workers compensation petitioners who developed various forms of blood order after working at Samsung’s chip or LCD labs.

Separately, the U.S. news agency released a profile of some victims of Samsung’s blood disorder cluster and a video clip summing up the two reports.

The impact of the reports rippled across the world.  On Aug. 10, the Al Jazeera news network dispatched a report derived from the AP accounts. On Aug. 16, Toronto Star, Canada’s largest daily newspaper by circulation, ran the AP pieces on the front page.

Samsung Grows Unsettled 

On Aug. 12, the AP, prodded by Samsung, ran the following correction:  “The Associated Press reported erroneously that a compensation plan the company offered covers some of the workers’ medical expenses. It covers all their medical expenses.”

The world’s largest tech company was just misleading.  Indeed, Samsung paid medical bills when former employees were successfully granted compensation for their sickness under its limited and divisive compensation scheme.  However, the company now uses its own undisclosed selection criteria for covering these recipients’ post-compensation medical expenses, said Lim Ja-woon, SHARPS’s in-house legal counsel.

Perturbed by the AP reports, Samsung released two separate press statements on Aug. 10 and Aug. 13.

In the Aug. 10 statement, the company said, “even if a supplier cites trade secrets to withhold information, the chemical product provided to Samsung has been certified as not containing any toxic substance.”  Samsung did not just shift the blame to suppliers, but also blurred the fact that some chemicals used in chip production can react to each other to create toxic substances. This is why full disclosure of all chemicals is important.

In the Aug. 13 statement, the company attempted to justify destruction of the entrance logs of one of its cleanrooms, citing a lack of regulatory clarification on such destruction.

The destruction came in 2010, after attempts by the family of Sohn Kyung-joo, a 53-year-old Samsung contractor who died of leukemia a year earlier, to use the logs as evidence of his chemical exposure in his posthumous worker compensation proceedings.

With much information shrouded in secrecy, the daily records of ins and outs of cleanrooms could be major evidence for workers compensation cases.  The logs showed how often and long workers and contractors have stayed in the dirt-free chip labs, according to many accounts, limned with chemical smells.

Government’s Freudian Slip 

On Aug. 12, South Korea’s Ministry of Employment and Labor denied the AP reports that it, at Samsung’s request, withheld the information.  “We designated the information in question as trade secret as defined under law,” said the labor ministry—accidentally admitting that it served Samsung when it should regulate the corporation in the interests of workers safety.

SHARPS’s Sit-in: 300 Days And Still Counting

Since Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS and its supporters have been staging a sit-in at Samsung D’light, the company’s so-called global exhibition space in south Seoul, calling for the world’s largest technology company to:  1) compensate all victims of occupational disease transparently and sufficiently; and 2) make a sincere and full apology.


In her blog post for The Huffington Post, ITUC General Secretary Sharan Burrow criticized Samsung for worker abuse.


The Samsung conglomerate has medieval working conditions behind modern technology, Sharan Burrow, general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation, summed up in her Huffington Post blog on Aug. 10, as she criticized the world’s largest technology company and its affiliates for poor working conditions.

Moral Compass

“Samsung is a business model that has lost its moral compass, based on exploitation and abuse of human rights at its supply chain,” said Burrow.

She announced that the ITUC has started a petition drive to end no-union policy and worker abuse at Samsung.

Petition Drive

The ITUC, based in Brussel,  is a leading voice of the world’s working people. The confederation represents 176 million workers through its 328 affiliated organizations within 162 countries and territories.

All are invited to sign the petition at http://act.ituc-csi.org/en/samsung

The following is a full text of the ITUC’s petition: 

Samsung: end worker abuse and abolish your “no-union” policy now

Samsung has a reputation for modern technology, but also a history of medieval conditions for the estimated 1,500,000 workers entrenched in a vast and shadowy web of subcontractors and subsidiaries that runs deep throughout the region. What’s more, the Asia Monitor Resource Centre (AMRC) reports that Samsung’s “no-union” policy affects the entire Asian electronics industry, “because Samsung Electronics intervenes actively to prevent the formation of unions at its suppliers.”

A leaked PowerPoint presentation — intended for the eyes of corporate bosses only — decrees specific “countermeasures” to be used to “dominate employees.” And the language is shocking. The leaked material instructs managers to: “isolate employees,” “punish leaders,” and “induce internal conflicts.” And that’s just corporate policy. AMRC reports instances of grave abuse, where Samsung “tapped workers’ phones, followed them, and approached their families with threats.”

With a precariously-employed workforce, inhumane conditions are rife. According to China Labor Watch, employees at Samsung factories, some under-aged, suffer through 100 hours of forced overtime per month, unpaid work, standing for 11 to 12 hours, verbal and physical abuse, severe age and gender discrimination, lack of worker safety… During a three-month period while the Samsung Galaxy tablet was being rushed out, one worker testified that she: “slept about two or three hours a night,” and had to stop breastfeeding her three-month-old infant to keep up with schedule.

Samsung is everywhere. If you have a smartphone — an Android or iPhone — there’s a good chance that parts in your phone are produced on factory floors controlled by Samsung and its affiliated companies. Now it’s up to all of us to tell Samsung this must stop now.

SHARPS’s Sit-in: 300 Days And Still Counting

Since Oct. 7, 2015, SHARPS and its supporters have been staging a sit-in at Samsung D’light, the company’s so-called global exhibition space in south Seoul, calling for the world’s largest technology company to:
1) compensate all victims of occupational disease transparently and sufficiently; and
2) make a sincere and full apology.